National Forest System Land Management Planning Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
By: USDA - Forest ServiceAbstract:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (U SDA) Forest Service (the Agency) is proposing a new rule at 36 CFR part 219 to guide development, revision, and amendment of land management plans for units of the National Forest System. The Agency considered six alternatives in detail, in cluding the proposed action. The proposed action and alternatives were developed through a nationwide collaborative effort. Alternative A is the proposed action. Modified Alternative A is Alternative A with changes made based on public comment, tribal consultation, and consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. Modified Alternative A is the preferred alternative. Alternative B is the no-action alternative, consisting of the planning provisions of the 1982 planning rule
as allowed by the transition language in the current planning rule. Alternative C would require the land management planning process and resulting plans to be limited to the minimum requirements of the National Forest Management Act with the addition of minimal requirements to meet the purpose and need for a new planning rule. Alternative D consists of Alternative A with additional and replacement direction focused on plan requirements for coordination, assessments, sustainability, species diversity, watershed protections, monitoring, and some additional and alternative definitions. Alternative E consists of Alternative A with additional and replacement direction focused on prescriptive requirements for public notification, assessments, monitoring, and public notification. The Agency identified eight significant issues, which along with the various aspects of the purpose and need define the scope of the effects analysis. The significant issues are related to: ecosystem restoration, watershed protection, diversity of plant and animal communities, climate change, multiple uses, efficiency and effectiveness, transparency and collaboration, and coordination and cooperation beyond National Forest System boundaries. The final programmatic environmental impact statement describes the effects of each alternative with respect to the purpose and need and significant issues.
Download Full Article